Today, the Great Pacific Garbage Patch contains 79,000 tonnes of plastic waste, almost half of which consists of fishing nets, the other half also mainly of fishing accessories. Researchers suspect that about one fifth of the rubbish patch comes from the aftermath of the 2011 tsunami in Japan. The other half of the floating plastic comes from Asia, and one third of the floating plastic objects have Japanese or Chinese labels.
Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines are considered to be the other main sources of the Pacific rubbish vortex. In the Indian Ocean, a particularly large amount of plastic waste is found at the large river mouths of the Indus and Ganges in India. "In Southeast Asia, for example, there are numerous wild dumpsites, some legal, some illegal. Here, plastic waste is simply collected in a heap. Preferably in valleys and usually a river flows at the bottom of the valley. Wind or floods ensure that considerable parts of the plastic waste first end up in the rivers and later in the sea," reports Henning Wilts.
Some studies conclude that most of the plastic in the ocean comes from land-based sources. Studies predict that litter will triple by 2050. The consequences are already dramatic: around 100,000 marine creatures die every year. But the consequences of floating rubbish are more far-reaching: coral reefs, which play a crucial role in maintaining the Earth's climate, are dying.
Plastic, once exposed to the elements, decomposes slowly. It becomes brittle, breaks down into smaller pieces, and abrasion and weathering pulverise the plastic pieces. Now there is another problem: microplastics (less than five
millimetres in diameter) and nanoplastics. Pieces smaller than a thousandth of a millimetre can be ingested by small marine creatures such as plankton and thus enter the food chain. Plastic fragments can accumulate toxins on their surface. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and even cancer-causing chemicals such as DDT and polychlorinated biphenyls preferentially accumulate on microparticles of polyethylene, the most commonly used industrial plastic. On beaches, researchers found microplastics from clothing such as fleece. Sooner or
later, tiny plastic particles are found in our food.
There are some promising approaches to fishing litter out of the oceans, for example with an oversized comb. One promising concept by 19-year-old Dutchman Boyan Slat consists of 50-kilometre-long
V-shaped tubes that collect 90 per cent of the floating plastic waste at the ocean surface. "The entire, gigantic problem will probably not be solved by projects of this kind alone. Most of the plastic waste is already
below sea level. This means that the rubbish carpet below sea level can hardly be approached any more. Another problem is the processing of the plastic waste collected from the sea. The plastic is so contaminated and weathered that it can often only be processed with an enormously high expenditure of resources
in order to reintroduce it into the cycle," says Henning Wilts.
Experts assume that two thirds of plastic waste is stored at the bottom of the sea. In the long run, wouldn't these all be good reasons to do without plastics completely in the future? "In general, doing without plastic is not necessarily sensible and in many areas it is not even possible. A hospital without plastic would be unimaginable. Electrical installations in houses would not be feasible, and in the case of furniture, for example, plastic would have to be replaced by wood - a resource that only grows back very slowly.
Designing a car without plastic would mean that this car would be enormously heavy and consume considerably more fuel. When it comes to bioplastics, we also have to consider first what we want to use the globally limited arable land for in the most sensible way possible," says Henning Wilts.